In the interpretation of real estate contracts, which part takes precedence?

The interpretation of real estate contracts emphasizes the superiority of written components over printed or standard terms. Written parts represent the specific agreements and intentions of the parties involved—often outlining unique terms tailored to their specific agreement. This precedence is crucial because it reflects the true consensus and intentions of the parties, rather than relying on generic printed terms that may not accurately capture their specific agreement or desires.

In many legal frameworks, when a conflict arises between printing and handwritten or specially written terms, the latter holds more weight because they indicate a deliberate agreement on the part of the parties. This principle ensures that the contract accurately reflects the unique circumstances and negotiations that took place between the parties, thereby fostering a more precise understanding of their obligations and rights.